| Thread: Your broad reach speed averege |
|
| SnoreBringGator | Kruger/Balogh Rigs Friday, July 23, 2010, 5:08:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
In 2006 I made it from Everglades City to Flamingo in 17 hours sailing a Kruger/Balogh on mostly a broad reach. The video is at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4070189264022781465# This run was a hoot. Fast forward to UFC 2010. Same Kruger hull design. Same 38 sq ft Balogh sail design, yet I broke an aka in similiar conditions, with a double reef!
The lesson? While it is possible to push a hybrid rig very hard, there is an element of luck. On a broad reach, there is a tendency for the boat to surf. [following is some fuzzy engineering] When the boat starts to catch a wave and surf, if the lee ama catches in the trough of the next wave there is sudden and significant drag. This drag is transmitted to the aka, and can result in catastrophic failure of the aka. The core factors are the ama's coefficient of drag, the design of the support structure for the aka and the strength of the aka. Chief has an intersting ama design, that is similiar to the Wildwasser ama I used several years ago. Only time and some very "gutsy" testing will tell where its' failure point is.
To address all this, I set a max speed on my rig of 4-5 mph, unless the waves are under a foot.
As I see the intent of the hybrid rig, it is to extend cruising range. The more robust the sailing rig becomes, the more weight you add. The heavier the sailing components, the more deadweight you have to paddle when not sailing. If the design is intended to be used mostly as a sailboat (Class 4), I would start from the ground up with a sailing design and put the hybrid rigs aside.
Bill |
| Reply |
|
| Ridgerunner | hull speed Saturday, July 24, 2010, 9:11:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| With about 20 kt winds and following seas, we sailed a Kruger Cruiser with twin Balogh sails, we did a steady 10 kts with a max speed on the GPS something like 12.2 kts. |
| Reply |
|
| crestedspray | Thanks Bill Saturday, July 24, 2010, 9:50:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
To address all this, I set a max speed on my rig of 4-5 mph, unless the waves are under a foot. As I see the intent of the hybrid rig, it is to extend cruising range. The more robust the sailing rig becomes, the more weight you add. The heavier the sailing components, the more deadweight you have to paddle when not sailing. If the design is intended to be used mostly as a sailboat (Class 4), I would start from the ground up with a sailing design and put the hybrid rigs aside.
hi bill, and thanks for the detailed reply...
In coming up with the hybrid design over the standard MKII sailrig - which I DO like - it was to preserve a little more of the kayak and shed a little of the sailrig. Something a little more paddle-able even if the drag is now asymetric . I didnt like the idea of a trimaran setup cantilevering over the main hull and sinking it some what in the process. I also believe the asymetric outrigger setup is more conducive to fishing, skin diving and photography. Ive thought to myself "will it REALLY paddle better though, especially with a weighted ama - even an increased weighted/displacement ama?". I dont know. A lot is a leap right off the blueprints entirely and I have reservations about a better efficiency paddle-sail craft. But again, I like the single ama approach and the cleaner lines and balance of the ama fulltime taking up ITS weight and the main hull full time taking up ITS weight. The MKII standard by contrast seems so, well not beleagured, but in still air, just overly weighted with the whole contraption sitting across its deck. The amas ride in the air when the keel is centered on the main hull in calm conditions. So theres that weight, then theres the gear in the hatches . My West River 180 doesnt exactly have high volume like a Chesapeake kayak so if I can spread the burden out a bit and lose some of the bulk of the twin amas, I'm happy. no free lunch though as they say in physics so what I "saved" is merely going to rear its ugly head elsewhere, but itll be interesting to see how and where it happens. Ive got BSD's 32 square foot sail reefable down to 20 as everyone knows so I think I have a forgiving rig in that manner. I just hope I can get a decent sail speed [5mph at 15knots] and a paddling experience that doesnt resemble an asymetric anchor drag ;)
Today is an important day anyway for me and the rig. My wife and child are gone for the whole day freeing up room upstairs to align the ama/aka for the final time, finish my tiller, attach my leeboard bracket, drill the hole in the deck for the mast and attach the mast footing on the robust platform I glued in place last sunday. If I can get a day off |
| Reply |
|
| crestedspray | Wow Saturday, July 24, 2010, 9:59:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
wow, thats seriously fast. how much sail area were you flying?
Pete |
| Reply |
|
| Ridgerunner | speed Sunday, July 25, 2010, 3:09:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| About 100 sq feet, but we didn't have the jib up, and we were falling off 5-7 foot waves about 10-12 miles offshore, so the waves added some speed. We were on a bee line from Sanibel lighthouse to Cape Romano. That run moved us from 17th or so into first place in the 2004 EC. We are more used to the 4.5-5 kt range. We start motor sailing (paddling) at about 3 kt. |
| Reply |
|
| ThisTripIsNecessary | broad reach Saturday, July 31, 2010, 1:10:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| Yesterday's data: choppy coastal sailing at New Haven, CT, wind ~9mph steady, 16 foot single-outrigger canoe, heavily built, ketch rig with standing lugs, and a small jib, total sail area 111 feet. GPS speed on the 'trimaran tack', my best performance course, was 7 knots fairly regular, bursts to just over 8 knots. (That was with a mainsail whose new aluminum spar is too thin at 1-inch diameter, so the sail flattens too much when I what I wanted was it to flatten at around 15 mph gusts. My bad!) -- Wade |
| Reply |
|
| crestedspray | Howdy Neighbor... Saturday, July 31, 2010, 10:04:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
Wade,
I live in Naugatuck. Ive kayaked a few times out of New Haven - actually west haven boat ramp near Chicks. Nice speed there!! At 111 sq.ft. thats a lot of power. Id laugh if that were you I saw last week going south on route 8 to 84 east. Craft looked to be 16 feet actually, single outrigger off port. Massive akas. All in all a really robust rig. It was carried on a flatbed behind a white car.
Normally Id not mention it, but a 16 foot outrigger sailboat is not a common sight in Connecticut on the highways.
LOL - was that you Wade?
Pete |
| Reply |
|
| ThisTripIsNecessary | Ha! Monday, August 02, 2010, 11:24:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
Pete -- Small world! Yes, that was me! (And yes, if you see an outrigger in Connecticut, reasonable chance it is me; some pictures of it at www.wtarzia.com/outrigger. It is also detailed at www.instructables.com under "Build a Short Dragon"). Were you in a truck and beeped when you drove by? I live in Waterbury up route 8. I launch at Lighthouse Point and usually sail past West Breakwater out to West Haven, then turn around where the waves start breaking on the flats and sail home outside in the Sound (when the water is not too crazy for a 16 footer). My girlfriend and I eat at Chicks frequently (then I go home and pop an extra statin pill :-).
I lived in Naugatuck until 2004, up on the hill in Andrew Ave apartments. That was where I built my first outrigger -- in my bedroom (don't all newly divorced men build boats under interesting situations?). I would take a walk around the neighborhood and pass by a yard that always a couple of skiffs, a kayak, and recently a larger sailboat (I still stroll the old neighborhood sometimes to get away from noisy Waterbury) -- I don't suppose it's possible this is you? Perhaps that would be pushing the statistics too much.
My sail area is good for this boat since its total weight is ~280 pounds, a lot to move in typical light NE air. The area will do until wind 15mph, and gusts to 20. Steadier winds over 15, and I would have to reduce or die of heart attack first, drowning second. The large ama was originally made to allow a shunting-proa mode of sailing, so it is heavier for ballast. I ended up staying with tacking mode, so I need to build a lighter volune-forward ama for it. Yes, the akas are heavyAfter I heard an aka cracking two miles out at New Haven on that first outrigger, I built my second boat with 3x3 douglas fir amas and I have no more nightmares. Break an aka, you swim home.
I have a galumpy tandem kayak I use to paddle in the swampy river at Bantam Lake, so you are far ahead of me in that arena, but if you ever feel the need to slow down and relax, maybe we could go for a paddle. If you add a sail rig, I can bring Short Dragon. My phone is 203 465 1077. -- best -- Wade/TTIN
(apologies for the personal blabbing, people: I was overwhelmed by the coincidence of having a watertriber live 4 miles down the road!) |
| Reply |
|
| Chief | Why Worry About Reaching Speed Tuesday, August 03, 2010, 7:05:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
I'm sort of wondering why you are interested in speed while broad reaching. Just about any boat is going to sail up to its potential on a broad reach.
It seems to me that what sets the overall performance is sailing upwind and how your boat will handle surfing downwind.
Of course comfort and keeping the boat moving at all times is important too as Wizard has proved time after time. |
| Reply |
|
| ThisTripIsNecessary | going to windward Tuesday, August 03, 2010, 9:55:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
More data then in response to Chief's post about ww work:
For my boat, going upwind cuts down on speed quite a bit. In the same good conditions, if I can make a regular 8 knots on broad or beam reach, then on a close reach I am down to 6-7. If I pinch to windward, 4 knots is typical. Bad chop reduces this to 3 (for me bad chop is 2-3 feet, frequent in shallow New Haven area with SW wind).
Outriggers usually do worse pinching up than other boats, and cat-ketch rigs as well; the fact that I have both and do get to windward is a pleasant fact. However, my best CMG course to windward is probably 55 degrees off wind. Trying to improve this with a jib out on a bowsprit now, but results are ambivalent early into this experiment (have been fussing too much with the logistics of 3 sails on a small boat to really attend to CMG).
Performance comparison for paddlers: this boxy sharpie hull and relatively high weight make this canoe a sluggish paddler. During calms: can maintain 3 knots for say an hour (leeboard up!) (but I am not a paddler); were I faced with paddling for hours at a stretch, doable speed would be 2 knots. GPS measured. With a headwind, forget it --the 24 inch deep hull (amidships), ~ 15 of that over water and with the amas and masts, paddling is just a way to make the last 500 feet to the ramp. -- Wade |
| Reply |
|
| crestedspray | LOL - Wade... Chief.... Tuesday, August 03, 2010, 10:18:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
I was behind you for a while that day squinting to get a good look at your rig. The double irony was at that very moment prior to my seeing your boat I was shooting down route 8 thinking of my own!!! Im like --nnnoooo friggin waayyyyy!!!!!!
Alas Wade, yours is a dedicated sailboat per se, while mine is a kayak-outrigger sail craft. This saturday it sees water [as an outrigger sailor] for the first time. I have a lot of concerns here about the whole enterprise. The WR180 steers like the Titanic - adding an outrigger isnt going to help - BUT - I NEVER put a rudder on the kayak. So itll be neat to see which has the greater sway - the rockerless keel line or the untested but generous sized balanced rudder. In making the WR180 I mistakenly DEEPENED the keel depth so the bottom more closely approximates a round bottomed racing hull. Its a twitchy over caffeinated craft to paddle but it is swift. It really moves. A few days before the sail day i have some things i look forward to and some that i fear. Itll be fast, but is the ama weighted enough to manage a sail at 32 sqft. in a 10 knot wind when blowing abeam from the ama side? Im not chewing my nails obviously, but a lot of work has gone into this project. If I dont nearly capsize and have control enough with my rudder on a strongly tracking craft ill be fine. I expect the fine ended kayak to get mighty wet in 2 to 3 foot chop. Ill be lake testing first so its a good chance the chop will be a foot or so.
Wade, I watched all your videos on Youtube. Great stuff and good speed. Do you hike out to balance your craft ever? You r latest craft really speeds along and handles the chop between the breakwaters quite admirably. The chop can get REALLY steep there. And its not always the depth or height of it, but the steep angle that it sometimes reaches thats a little forboding - in a kayak anyway.
Lastly, I want to thank you for your numbers with regard to speed - and on different points of sail. I appreciated the detail in your response and further information explaining your craft. Thanks for the phone number. I want to work out the kinks [and embaressment dealing with them] first, but should all go well itd be great to meet up at a GPS point as you mention!!
Chief, I mentioned a broad reach speed query just for a general feel on whats usually a less maintenance point of sail. I agree, going to windward, or surfing issues would be more revealing but I was looking for a general middle ground answer.
How do you do on beating with the Dreamcatcher/Boss rig Chief? The voluminous hull seems to keep you dry atleast from your video you linked on your latest excursion article.
Thanks Guys!!
Pete PS: My craft is hanging from the ceiling in my basement. While I see some boats and such in other folks yards and such - looking pretty well neglected [add mold] I couldnt for the life of me do that even if i was living in a house with yard again. |
| Reply |
|
| ThisTripIsNecessary | hiking out Wednesday, August 04, 2010, 12:13:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
Pete -- I have a side-seat on the ama side for 'hiking out' when I am on the "proa tack" (ama to WW) but I am not much hiked out; rather, I am sitting out a couple of feet at most, with my feet either dangling in the cockpit or on the aft cockpit seat. My ama is very heavy at ~70 pounds and 6 feet out from centerline is good ballast. If I sail as shunting proa (not yet on this boat) I can flood it with ~100 pounds of water too. If I sail from cockpit, the ama flies on that tack. If the water is not too crazy, I do stay in the cockpit and keep the deep-V ama lifted so that only ~6 inches of the deep rocker in the middle touches water; in those conditions, speed improves noticeably (you heard my comments on youtube as I sailed lifting the ama a little; you also heard my nervous excitement because I have had to dive over the ama to push it down in a gust :-)
(My cockpit now looks different from the old photos, having just added watertight chambers everywhere except for the aft cockpit/footwell for solo sailor, anticipating EC 2011, and also to feel better in that bad wave pattern between the breakwaters at New Haven -- I have encountered steep 3 footers out there, especially with tide running against S/SW wind. When you pass through it you have had a small adventure.)
On the "trimaran tack" (ama to lee) I sit in the cockpit reclining like the Grand Turk against my mizzen mast, so comfortable that I feel guilty :-) The ama lately has been getting pushed under when I reach/close reach at the higher speeds, no doubt because I added the jib, but instead of added complexity of another hiking seat, I just must build a shaped foam-and-glass ama with volume forward, since deep-V shapes in plywood limit the shaping possibilities (probably why Wharram cats seem to hobbyhorse a bit?)
You will enjoy exploring the outrigger sailing mode, but I have no clue about kayak conversions. The amas will rotate the hull to lee a little, maybe, but I guess you will have inflatables with less draggy impact? But I intuit you could get some lee helm at first until you learn where the board must go. Expect the first shakedown cruise or two to leave you downhearted. It comes together soon enough. My canoe is a perpetual prototype, so I feel that way often enough; sometimes the sun suddenly comes out, you take an extra tack to delay heading in, you insist on enjoying it, and it's a good day. --Wade |
| Reply |
|
| Chief | Beating Into Wind Wednesday, August 04, 2010, 8:49:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
CrestedSpray:
You asked about perfomance with the Dreamcatcher/BOSS rig beating into the wind. Not so good.
The BOSS rig works OK for reaching and downwind. It isn't so great beating into the wind. My tacking angle is pretty flat making upwind work extremely frustrating. The stronger the wind the worse it gets. This is one of the reasons I decided to design the TRC system. I know that upwind performance for a converted canoe/kayak is never going to be great, but I think there is room for significant improvement.
I will know if I have succeeded in a couple more weeks. |
| Reply |
|
| crestedspray | Ill be Wednesday, August 04, 2010, 3:34:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| Ill be interested in finding out how it went. Thanks.
Pete |
| Reply |
|
| redeyepaddler | snores rudder Saturday, August 07, 2010, 2:10:00 PM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
snore, the pic you sent me, and others i have seen of your Kruger DreamCatcher, show the stock rudder under sail. did you use a full rudder blade at all, or the stock comma shaped blade? and the new ammas, do they require a different mount set up? and, by the way, awesome task you completed, this past march's florida challenge, by the way. i'm still trying to figure out how manitou cruiser leaves ice and snow country and hauls butt in a canoe each spring. in march, all i can hold is a ski pole..... |
| Reply |
|
| SnoreBringGator | Rudder Saturday, August 07, 2010, 3:53:00 PM Category: Equipment Keyword: |
First thanks for the compliment. I got out of the boat in Tampa and swore I would not do that event again. Well time heals all wounds and I am trying to figure out how to get the time off to do another UFC or maybe the next Yukon Race- not the YRQ but the one that goes past Dawson.
Regarding the rudder- I used an oversize rudder that Etch gave me. I believe it is a balanced blade and it works great in heavy winds. But foolishly I did not rig a down haul. Apparently it floated up and put excess strain on the rudder cables. When I got to Sebastain Inlet I felt something poking my leg... It was fraid strands from the cable! Fortunately I had spares and with Running Mouth's help I put two new cables in. From there back to Tampa I used the comma. The lessons learned is that either you MUST rig a sound downhaul or figure out how to re-rig the boat with a thicker cable running through tubing in the aft compartment. My kayak is a NW Discover, it was not designed for sailing, and it was built with much thicker rudder cables. The concern with increasing the cable strength is the increased stress on the pin the rudder rotates around. Thicker cables will add to the stress of the pin and may cause catastrophic failure there. For now a downhaul seems like the best solution. Additionally, from Key Largo back to Tampa I kept the speed below 5 mph, unless the waves were under a foot or so. The lower speed keeps the stress off the rudder and reduces the probability of breaking and aka- like what happened the first day of the UFC. There is a third option- a whole new rudder mount. But that would significantly change the design, look and feel of the boat- something that I really do not want to do.
Regarding the new amas- the same aka design appears to have been used. The difference is that a the end of the aka there is a plastic saddle. Picture an inflated ama mounted to a piece of plastic that goes across the ama pretty much from one seam to the other. The ama itself is different as there are two pieces of webbing that are an integral part of the ama, so changing the mount used would require new amas. IMHO the old design is good, but no idiot-resistant. The new design does not have those two ropes that hold the ama on, one less thing to have go wrong.
Finally,I have looked at the rules. I do not see anything that would prevent you from taking one of your sled dogs along for the trip. When you get to the portage, just hook him up and ride!! (That comment should start some talk... and probably a rule change.)
Cheers!
Bill
LMAO- waiting for follow-up posts. |
| Reply |
|
| redeyepaddler | downhaul Sunday, August 08, 2010, 12:12:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| as is often the case, simple is best, but i've been sure i was missing something in the downhaul dept. however, my down haul is just black bungie chord and now doubled mason chord twisted with a reverse bias, so i no longer have the flutter vibration from the downhall line as it dips under to reach the blade. which now reveals the flutter of the lee board at certain speeds and angles off plumb.
i have dr kayaks old sea wind, and he seems to have added an aluminum plate to the top of the rudder, 2 inches wider than the original cable ties. i believe he used prusic or chordelette directly from the rudder to a jam cleat at either hand, on the hull, below the cowling and ahead of the seat. sort of self steering. i dont have it set to sail yet, (my aka braces are a tad offset of his set up) so i have not tried the jam cleat style tiller tamer. i dont know dr kayak, but i have a famous boat anyway! next i'd like to aquire crazy russians cat and a few of wizards craft. |
| Reply |
|
| Ridgerunner | Downhaul Sunday, August 08, 2010, 7:43:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
| I use a larger blade sailing with my Sea Wind. I put a piece of bungee cord in the middle of my downhaul to absorb the shock if it hits something and kicks up. The rudder is based on the WaterTribe Rudder (see Magazine). it is faired and fairly well balanced. |
| Reply |
|
| kapakahi | rudders Sunday, August 08, 2010, 10:26:00 AM Category: General Comment Keyword: |
I find using a pry with the paddle on the leeward side takes a lot of stress off the rudder; in fact I rarely use the rudder off the wind and steer with the paddle exclusively; helps with keeping the canoe on course (rounding up to windward) under full canvas.
You can lean to windward, paddle to the windward side and draw the stern to windward as well; it takes some practice but is a priceless when trying to keep all amas out of the water and burying when off the wind. It burns energy but keeps you actively paddle sailing and focused. Don't fall out of the boat!! :-)
Kap |
| Reply |
|
|